FCC 54.315 Revised as of April 6, 2012
Goto Year:2011 |
2013
§ 54.315 Disaggregation and targeting of high-cost support.
Link to an amendment published at 77 FR 14302 , Mar. 9, 2012.
(a) On or before May 15, 2002, all rural incumbent local exchange
carriers and rate-of-return carriers for which high-cost universal
service support pursuant to § § 54.301, 54.303, and/or 54.305 of this
subpart, subpart K of this part, and/or part 36 subpart F is available
must select a disaggregation path as described in paragraphs (b), (c),
or (d) of this section. In study areas in which a competitive carrier
was designated as a competitive eligible telecommunications carrier
prior to June 19, 2001, the rural incumbent local exchange carrier or
rate-of-return carrier may only disaggregate support pursuant to
paragraphs (b), (c), or (d)(1)(iii) of this section. A rural incumbent
local exchange carrier or rate-of-return carrier failing to select a
disaggregation path as described in paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this
section by May 15, 2002, will not be permitted to disaggregate and
target federal high-cost support unless ordered to do so by a state
commission as that term is defined in § 54.5.
(b) Path 1: Carriers Not Disaggregating and Targeting High-Cost
Support:
(1) A carrier may certify to the state commission that it will not
disaggregate and target high-cost universal service support.
(2) A carrier's election of this path becomes effective upon
certification by the carrier to the state commission.
(3) This path shall remain in place for such carrier for at least four
years from the date of certification to the state commission except as
provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(4) A state commission may require, on its own motion, upon petition by
an interested party, or upon petition by the rural incumbent local
exchange carrier or rate-of-return carrier, the disaggregation and
targeting of support under paragraphs (c) or (d) of this section.
(5) A carrier not subject to the jurisdiction of a state, e.g., certain
tribally owned carriers, may select Path 1, but must certify to the
Federal Communications Commission as described in paragraphs (1)
through (4) of this section.
(c) Path 2: Carriers Seeking Prior Regulatory Approval for the
Disaggregation and Targeting of Support:
(1) A carrier electing to disaggregate and target support under this
paragraph must file a disaggregation and targeting plan with the state
commission.
(2) Under this paragraph a carrier may propose any method of
disaggregation and targeting of support consistent with the general
requirements detailed in paragraph (e) of this section.
(3) A disaggregation and targeting plan under this paragraph becomes
effective upon approval by the state commission.
(4) A carrier shall disaggregate and target support under this path for
at least four years from the date of approval by the state commission
except as provided in paragraph (c)(5) of this section.
(5) A state commission may require, on its own motion, upon petition by
an interested party, or upon petition by the rural incumbent local
exchange carrier or rate-of-return carrier, the disaggregation and
targeting of support in a different manner.
(6) A carrier not subject to the jurisdiction of a state, e.g., certain
tribally owned carriers, may select Path 2, but must seek approval from
the Federal Communications Commission as described in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (5) of this section.
(d) Path 3: Self-Certification of the Disaggregation and Targeting of
Support:
(1) A carrier may file a disaggregation and targeting plan with the
state commission along with a statement certifying each of the
following:
(i) It has disaggregated support to the wire center level; or
(ii) It has disaggregated support into no more than two cost zones per
wire center; or
(iii) That the carrier's disaggregation plan complies with a prior
regulatory determination made by the state commission.
(2) Any disaggregation plan submitted pursuant to this paragraph must
meet the following requirements:
(i) The plan must be supported by a description of the rationale used,
including the methods and data relied upon to develop the
disaggregation zones, and a discussion of how the plan complies with
the requirements of this paragraph. Such filing must provide
information sufficient for interested parties to make a meaningful
analysis of how the carrier derived its disaggregation plan.
(ii) The plan must be reasonably related to the cost of providing
service for each disaggregation zone within each disaggregated category
of support.
(iii) The plan must clearly specify the per-line level of support for
each category of high-cost universal service support provided pursuant
to § § 54.301, 54.303, and/or 54.305 and/or part 36, subpart F of this
chapter in each disaggregation zone.
(iv) If the plan uses a benchmark, the carrier must provide detailed
information explaining what the benchmark is and how it was determined.
The benchmark must be generally consistent with how the total study
area level of support for each category of costs is derived to enable a
competitive eligible telecommunications carrier to compare the
disaggregated costs used to determine support for each cost zone.
(3) A carrier's election of this path becomes effective upon
certification by the carrier to the state commission.
(4) A carrier shall disaggregate and target support under this path for
at least four years from the date of certification to the state
commission except as provided in paragraph (d)(5) of this section.
(5) A state commission may require, on its own motion, upon petition by
an interested party, or upon petition by the rural incumbent local
exchange carrier, modification to the disaggregation and targeting of
support selected under this path.
(6) A carrier not subject to the jurisdiction of a state, e.g., certain
tribally owned carriers, may select Path 3, but must certify to the
Federal Communications Commission as described in paragraphs (d)(1)
through (5) of this section.
(e) Additional Procedures Governing the Operation of Path 2 and Path 3:
Disaggregation and targeting plan adopted under paragraphs (c) or (d)
of this section shall be subject to the following general requirements:
(1) Support available to the carrier's study area under its
disaggregation plan shall equal the total support available to the
study area without disaggregation.
(2) The ratio of per-line support between disaggregation zones for each
disaggregated category of support shall remain fixed over time, except
as changes are allowed pursuant to paragraph (c) and (d) of this
section.
(3) The ratio of per-line support shall be publicly available.
(4) Per-line support amounts for each disaggregation zone shall be
recalculated whenever the carrier's total annual support amount changes
using the changed support amount and lines at that point in time.
(5) Per-line support for each category of support in each
disaggregation zone shall be determined such that the ratio of support
between disaggregation zones is maintained and that the product of all
of the carrier's lines for each disaggregation zone multiplied by the
per-line support for those zones when added together equals the sum of
the carrier's total support.
(6) Until a competitive eligible telecommunications carrier is
certified in a study area, monthly payments to the incumbent carrier
will be made based on total annual amounts for its study area divided
by 12.
(7) When a competitive eligible telecommunications carrier is certified
in a study area, per-line amounts used to determine the competitive
eligible telecommunications carrier's disaggregated support shall be
based on the incumbent carrier's then-current total support levels,
lines, disaggregated support relationships, and, in the case of support
calculated under subpart K of this part, customer classes.
(f) Submission of Information to the Administrator:
(1) A carrier certifying under paragraph (b) of this section that it
will not disaggregate and target high-cost universal service support
shall submit to the Administrator a copy of the certification submitted
to the state commission, or the Federal Communications Commission, when
not subject to state jurisdiction.
(2) A carrier electing to disaggregate and target support under
paragraph (c) of this section shall submit to the Administrator a copy
of the order approving the disaggregation and targeting plan submitted
by the carrier to the state commission, or the Federal Communications
Commission, when not subject to state jurisdiction, and a copy of the
disaggregation and targeting plan approved by the state commission or
the Federal Communications Commission.
(3) A carrier electing to disaggregate and target support under
paragraph (d) of this section shall submit to the Administrator a copy
of the self-certification plan including the information submitted to
the state commission pursuant to paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (d)(2)(iv) of
this section or the Federal Communications Commission.
(4) A carrier electing to disaggregate and target support under
paragraph (c) or (d) of this section must submit to the Administrator
maps which precisely identify the boundaries of the designated
disaggregation zones of support within the carrier's study area.
[ 66 FR 30089 , June 5, 2001, as amended at 66 FR 59727 , Nov. 30, 2001]
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.