Goto Section: 1.113 | 1.117 | Table of Contents
FCC 1.115
Revised as of October 1, 2014
Goto Year:2013 |
2015
§ 1.115 Application for review of action taken pursuant to delegated
authority.
(a) Any person aggrieved by any action taken pursuant to delegated
authority may file an application requesting review of that action by
the Commission. Any person filing an application for review who has not
previously participated in the proceeding shall include with his
application a statement describing with particularity the manner in
which he is aggrieved by the action taken and showing good reason why
it was not possible for him to participate in the earlier stages of the
proceeding. Any application for review which fails to make an adequate
showing in this respect will be dismissed.
(b)(1) The application for review shall concisely and plainly state the
questions presented for review with reference, where appropriate, to
the findings of fact or conclusions of law.
(2) The application for review shall specify with particularity, from
among the following, the factor(s) which warrant Commission
consideration of the questions presented:
(i) The action taken pursuant to delegated authority is in conflict
with statute, regulation, case precedent, or established Commission
policy.
(ii) The action involves a question of law or policy which has not
previously been resolved by the Commission.
(iii) The action involves application of a precedent or policy which
should be overturned or revised.
(iv) An erroneous finding as to an important or material question of
fact.
(v) Prejudicial procedural error.
(3) The application for review shall state with particularity the
respects in which the action taken by the designated authority should
be changed.
(4) The application for review shall state the form of relief sought
and, subject to this requirement, may contain alternative requests.
(c) No application for review will be granted if it relies on questions
of fact or law upon which the designated authority has been afforded no
opportunity to pass.
Note: Subject to the requirements of § 1.106, new questions of fact or
law may be presented to the designated authority in a petition for
reconsideration.
(d) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the
application for review and any supplemental thereto shall be filed
within 30 days of public notice of such action, as that date is defined
in section 1.4(b). Opposition to the application shall be filed within
15 days after the application for review is filed. Except as provided
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section, replies to oppositions shall be
filed within 10 days after the opposition is filed and shall be limited
to matters raised in the opposition.
(e)(1) Applications for review of interlocutory rulings made by the
Chief Administrative Law Judge (see § 0.351) shall be deferred until
the time when exceptions are filed unless the Chief Judge certifies the
matter to the Commission for review. A matter shall be certified to the
Commission only if the Chief Judge determines that it presents a new or
novel question of law or policy and that the ruling is such that error
would be likely to require remand should the appeal be deferred and
raised as an exception. The request to certify the matter to the
Commission shall be filed within 5 days after the ruling is made. The
application for review shall be filed within 5 days after the order
certifying the matter to the Commission is released or such ruling is
made. Oppositions shall be filed within 5 days after the application is
filed. Replies to oppositions shall be filed only if they are requested
by the Commission. Replies (if allowed) shall be filed within 5 days
after they are requested. A ruling certifying or not certifying a
matter to the Commission is final: Provided, however, That the
Commission may, on its own motion, dismiss the application for review
on the ground that objections to the ruling should be deferred and
raised as an exception.
(2) The failure to file an application for review of an interlocutory
ruling made by the Chief Administrative Law Judge or the denial of such
application by the Commission, shall not preclude any party entitled to
file exceptions to the initial decision from requesting review of the
ruling at the time when exceptions are filed. Such requests will be
considered in the same manner as exceptions are considered.
(3) Applications for review of a hearing designation order issued under
delegated authority shall be deferred until exceptions to the initial
decision in the case are filed, unless the presiding Administrative Law
Judge certifies such an application for review to the Commission. A
matter shall be certified to the Commission only if the presiding
Administrative Law Judge determines that the matter involves a
controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for
difference of opinion and that immediate consideration of the question
would materially expedite the ultimate resolution of the litigation. A
ruling refusing to certify a matter to the Commission is not
appealable. In addition, the Commission may dismiss, without stating
reasons, an application for review that has been certified, and direct
that the objections to the hearing designation order be deferred and
raised when exceptions in the initial decision in the case are filed. A
request to certify a matter to the Commission shall be filed with the
presiding Administrative Law Judge within 5 days after the designation
order is released. Any application for review authorized by the
Administrative Law Judge shall be filed within 5 days after the order
certifying the matter to the Commission is released or such a ruling is
made. Oppositions shall be filed within 5 days after the application
for review is filed. Replies to oppositions shall be filed only if they
are requested by the Commission. Replies (if allowed) shall be filed
within 5 days after they are requested.
(4) Applications for review of final staff decisions issued on
delegated authority in formal complaint proceedings on the Enforcement
Bureau's Accelerated Docket (see, e.g., § 1.730) shall be filed within
15 days of public notice of the decision, as that date is defined in
§ 1.4(b). These applications for review oppositions and replies in
Accelerated Docket proceedings shall be served on parties to the
proceeding by hand or facsimile transmission.
(f) Applications for review, oppositions, and replies shall conform to
the requirements of § § 1.49, 1.51, and 1.52, and shall be submitted to
the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554.
Except as provided below, applications for review and oppositions
thereto shall not exceed 25 double-space typewritten pages.
Applications for review of interlocutory actions in hearing proceedings
(including designation orders) and oppositions thereto shall not exceed
5 double-spaced typewritten pages. When permitted (see paragraph (e)(3)
of this section), reply pleadings shall not exceed 5 double-spaced
typewritten pages. The application for review shall be served upon the
parties to the proceeding. Oppositions to the application for review
shall be served on the person seeking review and on parties to the
proceeding. When permitted (see paragraph (e)(3) of this section),
replies to the opposition(s) to the application for review shall be
served on the person(s) opposing the application for review and on
parties to the proceeding.
(g) The Commission may grant the application for review in whole or in
part, or it may deny the application with or without specifying reasons
therefor. A petition requesting reconsideration of a ruling which
denies an application for review will be entertained only if one or
more of the following circumstances is present:
(1) The petition relies on facts which related to events which have
occurred or circumstances which have changed since the last opportunity
to present such matters; or
(2) The petition relies on facts unknown to petitioner until after his
last opportunity to present such matters which could not, through the
exercise of ordinary diligence, have been learned prior to such
opportunity.
(h)(1) If the Commission grants the application for review in whole or
in part, it may, in its decision:
(i) Simultaneously reverse or modify the order from which review is
sought;
(ii) Remand the matter to the designated authority for reconsideration
in accordance with its instructions, and, if an evidentiary hearing has
been held, the remand may be to the person(s) who conducted the
hearing; or
(iii) Order such other proceedings, including briefs and oral argument,
as may be necessary or appropriate.
(2) In the event the Commission orders further proceedings, it may stay
the effect of the order from which review is sought. (See § 1.102.)
Following the completion of such further proceedings the Commission may
affirm, reverse or modify the order from which review is sought, or it
may set aside the order and remand the matter to the designated
authority for reconsideration in accordance with its instructions. If
an evidentiary hearing has been held, the Commission may remand the
matter to the person(s) who conducted the hearing for rehearing on such
issues and in accordance with such instructions as may be appropriate.
Note: For purposes of this section, the word "order" refers to that
portion of its action wherein the Commission announces its judgment.
This should be distinguished from the "memorandum opinion" or other
material which often accompany and explain the order.
(i) An order of the Commission which reverses or modifies the action
taken pursuant to delegated authority is subject to the same provisions
with respect to reconsideration as an original order of the Commission.
In no event, however, shall a ruling which denies an application for
review be considered a modification of the action taken pursuant to
delegated authority.
(j) No evidence other than newly discovered evidence, evidence which
has become available only since the original taking of evidence, or
evidence which the Commission believes should have been taken in the
original proceeding shall be taken on any rehearing ordered pursuant to
the provisions of this section.
(k) The filing of an application for review shall be a condition
precedent to judicial review of any action taken pursuant to delegated
authority.
(Secs. 4, 303, 307, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, 1082, 1083; 47 U.S.C.
154, 303, 307)
[ 28 FR 12415 , Nov. 22, 1963, as amended at 41 FR 14871 , Apr. 8, 1976;
44 FR 60295 , Oct. 19, 1979; 46 FR 18556 , Mar. 25, 1981; 48 FR 12719 ,
Mar. 28, 1983; 50 FR 39000 , Sept. 26, 1985; 54 FR 40392 , Oct. 2, 1989;
55 FR 36641 , Sept. 6, 1990; 57 FR 19387 , May 6, 1992; 62 FR 4170 , Jan.
29, 1997; 63 FR 41446 , Aug. 4, 1998; 67 FR 13223 , Mar. 21, 2002; 76 FR 70908 , Nov. 16, 2011]
return arrow Back to Top
Goto Section: 1.113 | 1.117
Goto Year: 2013 |
2015
CiteFind - See documents on FCC website that
cite this rule
Want to support this service?
Thanks!
Report errors in
this rule. Since these rules are converted to HTML by machine, it's possible errors have been made. Please
help us improve these rules by clicking the Report FCC Rule Errors link to report an error.
hallikainen.com
Helping make public information public